Somehow I'm not surprised...

... that I can't seem to find this reported anywhere else:

http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewCulture.asp?Page=\Culture\archive\200603\CUL20060316b.html

What? You mean the powers-that-be in New Orleans illegally confiscated guns .... and then lied about it?!?!? Surely not! New Orleans is run by a Democratic mayor, and Louisiana is run by a Democratic governor ..... but aren't we being indoctrinated to distrust those greeeeeedy Republicans? I thought Democrats represented government we could trust...

Oopsie!

In searching for this story on-line, I came across several "news" sources which had originally "reported" on the gun-confiscations. In reading the comments on those "stories", I took note of how quickly "Liberals" will defend what they refer to as "civil rights" and constitutional freedoms, but they steadfastly refuse to support the Second Amendment. They'll defend the powers that confiscated the guns, making strained arguments about the definition of the word "regulate".

Those same blissninnies will realize - too late - that they should have defended our rights once their rights (to protest the Iraq war, to kill unborn children, etc.) are taken away.

You don't have to like our freedoms, you moonbats, but you'd better learn to defend them, lest you lose your own.

But I digress...

Kim du Toit has some valuable insight into what should be done when the gubmint breaks the law and then lies about it:

http://www.theothersideofkim.com/index.php/tos/single/9167/

Funny how the blissninnies are screaming at the top of their little lungs about how the Bush administration runs roughshod over their rights, but when Democrats do the same thing, they ignore it.